Legal Opinion

McMaken v. McMaken

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1851PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Error to the Chancery Court of Fayette. Tried before the Hon. W. W. Mason.

1Opinion of the CourtDargan, C. J.

This bill was filed by the defendant in error against Robert S. McMaken, Maria Hughes, Andrew McMaken, Nathaniel L. McMaken, and James Dyson & Wife, *577for the purpose of setting aside the nuncupative will of Nathaniel McMaken, deceased, which had been admitted to probate in the County Court of Franklin. It alleges than Nathaniel Mc-Maken died leaving three children, the complainant, Nathaniel L. McMaken, and Mary Ann, the wife of James Dyson. The bill also sets out the supposed will, from which it appears, that the testator bequeathed to his nephew, Robert S. McMaken, two thousand dollars; to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Batre v. Auze's heirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
  2. Goodman v. BenhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  3. Vancleave v. BeamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Prout v. HogeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. City of Mobile v. Gulf Development Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Reid v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Amann v. BurkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Poyner v. WhiddonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API