Siensheimer v. Maryland Motor Car Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Hays County Court; J. B. Wilson, Judge. Action by the Maryland Motor Car Insurance Company and others against J. F. Siens-heimer & Company. Judgment-for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.
[1] 1. Appellees object to the consideration of appellants’ assignments of error for the reason that they do not comply with rule 25 (142 S. W. xii), in that they do not refer to that portion of appellants’ motion for a new trial wherein the error assigned is complained of. This objection must be sustained. Said assignments do not refer to the motion for a new trial.
2. Appellants insist that fundamental error was committed against them for the reason that the court was without jurisdiction to try this case, or to render the judgment herein rendered. The facts upon which this contention is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Baker v. SmelserTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Schulz v. Frank Tessman & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1899
- San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. AddisonTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Gulf, West Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. FrommeTexas Supreme Court · 1905
- Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. UnderwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Isbell v. Kenyon-Warner Dredging Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
- Taylor v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Simons v. Federal Bar Building CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
- Fannin County Nat. Bank v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Simms Oil Co. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.