Legal Opinion

Ex parte Jew You On

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 24, 1926No. 19133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOURQUIN, District Judge.

This is the usual petition for habeas eorpus to procure release and admission of a Chinese person into this country. It purports to be by the father of the would-be immigrant, and amongst other things alleges positively that the father is native to this country; that the immigrant is his legitimate son; that by the immigration officers he was “denied a fair hearing”; that they denied admission because of “certain alleged discrepancies in the testimony,” and' by reason of their “prejudice” and “abuse of discretion”; that the evidence “proves conclusively and without…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re JonesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1927
  2. Carson Inv. Co. v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. United States ex rel. Soy Sing v. Chinese InspectorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. Dorsey v. GillCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  4. Wong Gook Chun v. ProctorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API