Legal Opinion
Rohlfing v. Cat's Paw Rubber Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 18, 1951No. 50 C 229, 50 C 844PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LA BUY, District Judge.
The complaints in both of these suits are brought by alleged class plaintiffs and other similarly situated against the defendants for purported violations of Sections 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1, 2, 4, 5, 15 note, and Sections 1, 12 and 16 of the Clayton and Robinson-Patman Acts, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 12, 22, 26, 13, 13a, 13b, 21a. Plaintiffs in the case of Rohlfing v. Cat’s Paw Rubber Co., Inc. are alleged to be independent shoe repair men in the City of Chicago who sell at retail to the public certain merchandise as customarily and usually…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Robertson v. Railroad Labor BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Insurance Co. v. BangsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Becker v. AngleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. North American Rockwell Corp.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1970
- California Clippers, Inc. v. United States Soccer Football Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
- Bruner v. Republic Acceptance CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1961
- Bucholz v. HuttonDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1957
- Sun-X Glass Tinting of Mid-Wisconsin, Inc. v. Sun-X International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.