Legal Opinion
United States v. David W. Reifsteck
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 9, 1988No. 87-3759PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
David W. Reifsteck appeals his conviction of conspiracy to unlawfully use electronic devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. For the following reasons, we affirm the conviction.
I
David Reifsteck was a licensed investigator who operated his corporation, Domestic Investigations, Inc. DBA Corporate & Domestic Investigations, in Cincinnati, Ohio. The grand jury in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio indicted Reifsteck and his corporation on two counts each relating to an incident in which Reifsteck allegedly conspired with two unindicted…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Charles BravermanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Lowell J. Bavers, Duane J. French, and May L. BaversCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Donald SchrockCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Charles Donald Chorman, United States of America v. John L. Erdman, A/K/A PopsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Joseph J. JerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Tamara Milligan (92-6654) Benny Milligan (92-6655) James McElveen (92-6666)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.