Legal Opinion

Batteries Plus, LLC v. Mohr

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 7, 2000No. 99-1319PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

¶ 1. Batteries Plus, LLC (BP) brings this appeal after a jury found that its discharge of Clinton Mohr violated the public policy prohibiting an employer from extracting repayment of expenses from employees by means of economic duress. BP con*780tends that Mohr's discharge was lawful and did not violate any public policy. We reject BP's argument. The evidence is sufficient to support the jury's conclusion that BP wrongfully discharged Mohr when he refused to acquiesce to the demand that he reimburse BP for $11,449.88 paid to him for expenses incurred during his employment.

¶ 2. BP also complains…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bushko v. Miller Brewing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  3. D'Huyvetter v. A.O. Smith Harvestore ProductsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  4. Wandry v. Bull's Eye Credit UnionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Winkelman v. Beloit Memorial HospitalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Batteries Plus, LLC v. MohrWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Batteries Plus, LLC v. MohrWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API