Legal Opinion

Vanderveer v. Erie Malleable Iron Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1956No. Appeal, 94PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

In this case the plaintiffs sought an accounting in equity by the defendant company for royalties allegedly due under a written agreement licensing to the defendant the manufacturing use of certain patents on demountable rim wheels for automotively propelled ve hides. Plaintiff Vanderveer was the inventor and patentee. The other plaintiff, Florence K. Walker, obtained her interest in the contract by assignment from Vanderveer of a share therein.

In its answer to the bill of complaint, the defendant averred that the licensing contract had been terminated on a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Headley Good Roads Co. v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
  2. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. MacGregorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. MacGregor v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jewell W. Vanderveer v. Erie Malleable Iron CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  2. Vanderveer v. Erie Malleable Iron Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API