Legal Opinion

Baldwin v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided October 7, 1953No. Civ. A. No. 62-52PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELEHANT, District Judge.

In three separate pleadings, filings 122, 121 and 110, the defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company has objected to requests for admissions severally served and filed herein by (a) Osborne Livestock Commission Company, (b) Beverly Livestock Sales Company, and (c) Salina Sales Pavilion. Each objection asserts, concerning the request at which it is aimed, (a) that the request is not for the admission of facts, but rather a narrative statement con-*85taming many conclusions and couched in such indefinite language as to preclude the possibility of its admission; (b)…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
  2. Sparton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Micro-Moisture Controls, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API