Legal Opinion

Suman v. Springate

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This'was an action by the appellants Mary E. Suman and her husband, against the appellee, Springate, for the partition of the half of a certain town or city lot, the plaintiff Mary E. Suman claiming four-ninths thereof.

The cause was tried by the court, who made a special finding of the facts and stated conclusions of law thereon, aud rendered judgment for the defendant.

Errors are assigned' upon the rulings of the court upon demurrers to some of the pleadings, and upon the conclusions of law stated by the court upon the facts found; but the questions arising upon the pleadings and upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. HolmesIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Greensburgh, Milford, & Hope Turnpike Co. v. SidenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Behler v. WeyburnIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Shumaker v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. McMillen v. TerrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  2. Dixon v. DukeIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Levering v. ShockeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Graham v. Henderson Elevator Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Wilhite v. HamrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API