Legal Opinion
In re Goodwin
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 28, 1930No. 39843PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
There is before the court for review, in the above-entitled matter, a certificate of the referee, from which it appears that the trustee petitioned the referee for leave to examine, under section 21a of the Bankruptcy Act (USCA title 11, § 44(a), one Daniel R. W. Murdock. The application did not state the purposes for which the examination' was to be held. Without notice to the witness, the petition was granted in ex parte proceedings, and a subpoena in the usual form issued out of this court commanding the witness to appear before the referee at a time and place…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Rawlins v. Hall-Epps Clothing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1914
- In re Youroveta Home & Foreign Trade Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Abbott v. Wauchula Mfg. & Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1916
- In re CarleyDistrict Court, D. Kentucky · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Paramount Publix CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- In Re GHR Energy Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
- Eastern Utilities Investing Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Hilles v. WisemanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- In re McLellan Stores Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1933