Legal Opinion

State v. Bonds

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 30, 2001No. 1 CA-CV-00-0393PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALL, Judge.

¶ 1 Garcia Bail Bonds and Seneca Insurance Company (referred to collectively as “surety”) appeal from the trial court’s order forfeiting an appearance bond after Theodore Pineda (“defendant”) failed to appear at a pretrial conference. Defendant was unable to appear in the Arizona case because he had returned to Colorado and been incarcerated there after a judge of the Superior Court in Maricopa County permitted him to return to Colorado and self-surrender on an unrelated fugitive complaint. Surety claims that these circumstances constitute reasonable cause excusing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. State v. VeatchArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. Affordable Bail BondsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. State v. Superior Court in & for County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Old West Bonding Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. JOHN C. v. SargeantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. In Re Bond Forfeiture in Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  4. State v. Bail Bonds USACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API