State v. Bonds
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALL, Judge.
¶ 1 Garcia Bail Bonds and Seneca Insurance Company (referred to collectively as “surety”) appeal from the trial court’s order forfeiting an appearance bond after Theodore Pineda (“defendant”) failed to appear at a pretrial conference. Defendant was unable to appear in the Arizona case because he had returned to Colorado and been incarcerated there after a judge of the Superior Court in Maricopa County permitted him to return to Colorado and self-surrender on an unrelated fugitive complaint. Surety claims that these circumstances constitute reasonable cause excusing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Taylor v. TaintorSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- State v. VeatchArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. Affordable Bail BondsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- State v. Superior Court in & for County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. Old West Bonding Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- JOHN C. v. SargeantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- In Re Bond Forfeiture in Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. Bail Bonds USACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.