Legal Opinion

Vest v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1931No. 8 Div. 277PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

In a bill for sale of lands for division, the averment: “The complainant owns a one-third undivided interest for life and the defendant is the owner of a two-thirds undivided interest in fee simple and owns the remainder of complainant’s one-third undivided interest for life,” sufficiently sets forth the interests of the parties, and that all the joint owners are before the court.

How their respective interests were acquired, and muniments of title, are matters of evidence. Henderson v. Stinson, 207 Ala. 365, 92 So. 453; Curlee v. Scott, 207 Ala. 478, 93 So. 393; Foley v. Brock, 173 Ala. 336,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Curlee v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Foley v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hardee v. HardeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Coppett v. MonahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Brewer v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Atkins v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
  5. Bowden v. TeagueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API