Purner v. Koontz
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, C. J.
The appellant filed his complaint against the appellees, alleging that he was the owner of the undivided one-half of certain real estate described, and that the appellees were the owners of the remaining one-half, and asked for partition.
To this complaint, appellees filed a pleading which is styled an answer, but which is, in effect, a cross-complaint, and in which they admit substantially, all the t facts pleaded in the complaint, but aver that the appellant received from the common ancestor and former owner of said lands advancements to an amount in excess of the full value of the lands to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Chambers v. ButcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- New v. NewIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Vanvalkenberg v. VanvalkenbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Jones v. JulianIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hadley v. KaysIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Newhouse Mill & Lumber Co. v. KellerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Cole v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Barnett v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Meleaka How On v. Amoe Ah HoHawaii Supreme Court · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.