Doe v. District Attorney
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Concurrence
ALEXANDER, and SILVER, JJ.,
concurring.
[¶ 38] Today we join a unanimous Court in holding that review of the 1999 and subsequent amendments to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), 34-A M.R.S. §§ 11201-11256 (2006); P.L.2007, ch. 393, § 1 (codified at 17-A M.R.S. § 261), needs further development of the facts.
[¶ 39] We write separately to emphasize that Maine’s SORNA must be reviewed according to its unique history; our precedent; the requirements of the Maine Constitution, which distinguish the analysis here from the analysis of the application of sex offender…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.