Legal Opinion

Eberhart v. Lind

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1933No. 24503. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinebt, J.

This is an action to rescind a real estate contract and the subsequent assignment thereof to plaintiff, as vendee, and to recover the purchase price paid thereon. Demurrers to the second amended complaint having been sustained, and plaintiff having elected to stand on his pleading, a judgment of dismissal was entered, from which plaintiff appeals.

According to the complaint as finally amended and the exhibits thereto attached, on which we must rely for a statement of the facts, respondents Rosaia were, on May 2, 1930, the owners of two lots of ground located in the vicinity of what is referred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ashford v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Reddish v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Decker v. SchulzeWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Palmer v. Washington Securities Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Hansen v. AhrensWashington Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HustonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Gillmore v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Litel v. MarshWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Kolosoff v. TurriWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Wgw Usa, Inc. And Tian Qing Guo v. Legacy Bellevue 530, LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API