Legal Opinion

Smith v. Brown

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 1, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted a joint application for direct appellate review in this case because we thought it raised issues in connection with a so-called gestational surrogacy arrangement, see R.R. v. M.H., 426 Mass. 501, 509 n.10 (1998), that needed to be decided by this court. After further examination, we conclude that the reservation and report of the case with a lengthy series of questions by a judge in the Probate and Family Court is improper, and that the case does not present a suitable occasion to comment on the issues raised by the questions.3 Accordingly, we discharge the report.

We briefly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. R.R. v. M.H.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. In the Matter of JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Culliton v. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. A.H.W. v. G.H.B.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  3. Riley v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Ahw v. GhbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API