D.V. ex rel. B.V. v. Pennsauken School District
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOEL SCHNEIDER, United States Magistrate Judge
This Opinion addresses whether plaintiffs present a viable cause of action that they were retaliated against because of their educational advocacy on behalf of D.V., a minor, and whether D.V.’s claim for sexual orientation. bullying is actionable. The answer to both these questions is no. Summary judgment will therefore be entered in favor of defendants.1 Background
The Court will start this Opinion by providing a summary of the background facts. As required in the present context, plaintiffs will be given the benefit of all reasonable…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- D.B. AND C.B. VS. JERSEY CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION (L-3334-16, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- DOE v. University of ScrantonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Hamilton v. Oswego Community Unit School District 308District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Hepburn v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- K.J. v. GREATER EGG HARBOR REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.