Legal Opinion

People v. Palazzola

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided June 30, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas Dickens, J.

Defendant, represented by counsel from the outset of this action to the time of the imposition of sentence, now himself brings this coram nobis motion, written entirely in longhand, for the purpose of having a hearing granted in order to have the judgment of conviction eventually nullified.

In the petition annexed to the notice of motion, defendant asserts as the reason for instituting this application that “ your petitioner never did realize that he was insane — nor did the Court, at the time of pleading and sentence have any knowledge or in any way know that petitioner was mentally unsound.”

L…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. People v. CodarreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. People v. CanforaNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1957
  4. People v. FloraNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. People v. Codarre, New York County Courts1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. BrimNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960
  2. People v. JonesNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1962
  3. People v. PassanteNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960
  4. People v. PonitzNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API