Legal Opinion
G.E.M. Sundries Company, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 12, 1960No. 16396PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from the Supreme Court of the Territory (now State) of Hawaii, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1293. It concerns the validity of the Hawaii Fair Trade Act (§§ 205-21, 205-25, Revised Laws of Hawaii, 1955), which legalizes contracts by which manufacturers of trademarked goods bind retailers, both contracting and non-contracting, to maintain resale prices fixed by the manufacturer in the accepted contracts. Appellant contends, contrary to the judgment of the Hawaii Supreme Court, that this Act is invalid under § 3 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 3, and, in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Liberty Warehouse Co. v. Burley Tobacco Growers' Co-Operative Marketing Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Bulova Watch Co. v. Zale Jewelry Co. of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
- Corning Glass Works v. Ann & Hope, Inc. of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Janel Sales Corp. v. Lanvin Parfums, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Norman's on the Waterfront, Inc. v. WheatleyDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.