Legal Opinion

Smith v. Ross

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1939No. 560PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The above entitled cause is now being determined as an error proceeding by reason of defendants’ appeal from the judgment of the court of common pleas of Darke County, Ohio.

The original action was for recovery of concealed assets and was brought in *554the common pleas court, by virtue of §10506-67, GC. The trial court found for the plaintiff and against the defendants in the sum of $1340.18 together with 10% penalty, amounting to $134.01 and also costs of the proceeding. Within statutory time defendants gave notice of appeal.

Defendants, Clara R. Ross and B. H. Ross, were…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burns v. DailyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. In Re Estate of HowardOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
  3. In re Estate of SibertOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Estate of Hittle v. GagleOhio Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API