Legal Opinion

Kutch v. Holley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1890No. 6412PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from Wilbarger. Tried below before Hon. P. M. Stine.

1Opinion of the Court

HOBBY, Judge.

—If, as contended by plaintiffs in error under their first assignment, the court erred in admitting over their objections the certified copy of the deed from Williams & Kirkland to Mrs. A. M. Kutch, because it had not been filed three days before the trial and notice given thereof, etc., we do not see how such error could have in any degree injuriously affected their rights. They themselves testified to the execution of such deed by Williams & Kirkland to Mrs. A. M. Kutch, conveying the property on Groesbeck Creek in Hardeman County on which they were living in the spring of…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. McInnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Co. v. TaylorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  3. Horbach v. TyrrellNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Creosoted Wood Block Paving Co. v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Thomason v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API