Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Mid-America Protein, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1976No. 75-373PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stouder

This action arises out of a mortgage foreclosure proceeding which resulted in the sale of the subject property and the entry of a personal deficiency decree and judgment.

On October 14, 1974, the plaintiff-mortgagee, Armour and Company (“Armour”), filed a complaint for the foreclosure of a mortgage against Mid-America Protein, Inc. (“MAP”), the mortgagor, and certain other defendants who were judgment creditors of the mortgagor. Among the judgment-creditors of MAP was the Schaub Engineering Company. Illinois Beef Packers, Inc. (“Illini”), purchased Schaub Engineering Company’s judgment against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eggers v. AdlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  2. Lewis v. MattesonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929
  3. Skolnik v. PetellaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  4. Baker v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Comet Casualty Co. v. SchneiderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Whitley v. Lutheran HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Bmo Harris v. TohatanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. Gem City Savings & Loan Ass'n v. McCloskeyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n v. TalaganovAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API