Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Moultrie

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 2005PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

McCAFFERY, J.:

¶ 1 After a conversation with a police officer in which he was told he was free to leave, Appellant, Eric Moultrie, consented to a search of his person. The search revealed that he was carrying packets of what was later determined to be cocaine and heroin. On appeal, we are asked to decide whether the fruits of that search should have been suppressed. We conclude that the encounters between the police and Appellant were proper investigative detentions, and that Appellant’s consent to the subsequent search was voluntary. Accordingly, the suppression court properly…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Com. v. Thomas, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. Commonwealth v. Gorbea-LespierSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Com. v. Benitez, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Com. v. Rice, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Benitez, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API