Legal Opinion

Esposito v. Chandler

Loudoun County Circuit Court

Decided May 31, 1991No. Case No. (Chancery) 13083PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By JUDGE JAMES H. CHAMBLIN

This cause is before the Court on the Demurrers, or, in the alternative, Motions for Summary Judgment, filed by the defendants, Donald R. Chandler and Carolyn E. Chandler, Betty McCarthy, and BMC Realtors, Inc. ("BMC") to the Amended Bill of Complaint. The Court heard oral argument thereon on May 3, 1991.

For the reasons hereinafter set forth, the Court considers the defendants’ pleadings both as demurrers and motions for summary judgment.. As demurrers, they are sustained, and as motions for summary judgment, they are granted. Accordingly, this suit is dismissed as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fox v. CustisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. Allen Realty Corp. v. HolbertSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. Horner v. AhernSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  4. Spence v. GriffinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  5. Poe v. VossSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ballard v. StephanFairfax County Circuit Court · 2008
  2. Warf v. FieldsLoudoun County Circuit Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API