Legal Opinion
Perry v. Lloyd
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided January 8, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The action is founded upon a coupon for thirty dollars attached to a bond issued by the defendant. It is admitted that the coupon has not been paid.
Plaintiff’s claim is resisted on two grounds, as revealed by the two separate defenses set up in the answer: First, that the coupon if presented for payment was presented for payment in gold coin, and that payment in gold coin at the time of the alleged presentment was illegal and prohibited under the laws of the United States; second, that the defendant is a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Evertson v. . National Bank of NewportNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Cunningham v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Second Russian Insurance v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Richards & Co. v. WreschnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Rothschild v. . Rio Grande Western Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Siemens & Halske AktiengesellschaftDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- Scott v. PlattOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Glynn v. United Steel Works Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1935
- John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. School District No. 17Montana Supreme Court · 1935
- Lusk State Bank v. Town Council of LuskWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.