Legal Opinion

Williford v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 14, 1932No. 8684PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

On January 13, 1931, suit was instituted on a promissory note for $100 and interest, in the city court of Soperton, returnable to the February term, which by law would convene on the first Monday in that month. The court’s process was duly issued, requiring the defendant to appear and answer on the first Monday in February. In making the copy process to be served upon the defendant, the time at which he should appear was inadvertently stated as the third Monday in February. When the suit was instituted, garnishment was also issued, returnable to the February term of the city court of Dublin,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Benson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Harris v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Williams v. Buchanan & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  4. Ware v. LamarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Gowen v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  4. Quigley v. QuigleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Gilbert v. Brotherton Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API