Legal Opinion

John Doe 1 v. Sam Reed

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 23, 2012No. 11-35854PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Concurrence by Judge N.R. SMITH.

OPINION

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs Protect Marriage Washington (“PMW”), John Doe # 1, and John Doe #2 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) seek to enjoin Defendants, the Secretary of State and Public Records Officer of the State of Washington, from releasing the names of people who signed petitions supporting a Washington referendum. These petitions are already widely available on the internet. We dismiss this case as moot because we cannot grant Plaintiffs effective relief.

I

Washington citizens can use the referendum process to reject…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jacobs Technology Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API