John Doe 1 v. Sam Reed
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Concurrence by Judge N.R. SMITH.
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Protect Marriage Washington (“PMW”), John Doe # 1, and John Doe #2 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) seek to enjoin Defendants, the Secretary of State and Public Records Officer of the State of Washington, from releasing the names of people who signed petitions supporting a Washington referendum. These petitions are already widely available on the internet. We dismiss this case as moot because we cannot grant Plaintiffs effective relief.
I
Washington citizens can use the referendum process to reject…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jacobs Technology Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017