Legal Opinion

Fordyce v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 25, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Monroe District Court. — Hon. Dell Stuart, Judge. Action in equity, judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, C. J.

— In 1882 the defendants William *42Hicks, Aaron Hicks and T. S. Tharp became indebted to Malvina Bone, the plaintiff’s intestate. A judgment was recovered in 1884 on such indebtedness against William Hicks and T. S. Tharp. Afterwards, in 1886, a judgment was recovered on the same indebtedness against the defendant Douglass, executor of Aaron Hicks. In 1883, Aaron and William Hicks conveyed certain real estate to said Douglass, as the plaintiff claims, for the purpose of defrauding their creditors; and the object of this action, which was commenced in 1887, is to set aside the conveyance, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vannice v. BergenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  2. Bridgman & Co. v. McKissickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863
  3. Stephens v. Heirs of HarrowSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  4. Shimer v. HammondSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  5. Smith v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adams v. YoungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Fowler v. MausIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Boggs v. DouglassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Boggs v. DouglassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  5. Albia State Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API