Legal Opinion

Boggs v. Douglass

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 11, 1898PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Monroe District Court. — Hon. T. M. Fee, Judge. Action to recover rents and profits of certain lands. The defendant alleged he held possession of one tract under a judgment and decree establishing it as a lien, and ordering- the sale thereof, and asked that the rents and profits derived therefrom be applied in satisfaction of the judgment. This relief was denied and he appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1

*3482 *345— In Boggs v. Douglass, 89 Iowa, 150, the title to an undivided one-half of the south one-half of the northeast one-fourth of section 32, in township 7 north, of range 16 west of fifth principal meridian, was adjudged to be in the plaintiff, though subject to the lien of a judgment recovered by Cassady against William and Aaron Hielas, and assigned to the defendant, and that to the other undivided one-half thereof in the defendant. This was one of the. judgments considered in Fordyce v. Hicks, 76 Iowa, 41, and established as a lien against this land superior to plaintiff’s title in Boggs v.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Koon v. TramelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Morrow v. MorganTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hewitt v. RankinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  4. Newman v. De LorimerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  5. Porter v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Van Veen v. Van VeenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  2. Redwine v. AnsleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Bonbright v. BonbrightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Raymond v. WhitehouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. Iowa Power Co. v. HooverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API