Legal Opinion
United States v. National Lead Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
Decided June 16, 1896PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREEK, District Judge.
The plaintiff has filed a petition, duly verified, in the above-stated cause, setting forth, among other things, that the action was brought to recover certain moneys from the defendant, which it had obtained under alleged mistake,’ arising on the following facts: The defendant is a manufacturer of various compounds of lead, and for its business imported large quantities of lead ore, upon which were paid the duties lawfully levied by force of the statute in such case made and provided. This lead ore was used in the manufacture, among other things, of white lead, exported…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Iasigi v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1853
- Beardsley v. LittellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1877
- Easton v. HodgesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People, Ex Rel. Moll v. DanzigerMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Victor G. Bloede Co. of Baltimore City v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1899
- National Cash-Register Co. v. LelandU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1896
- Shaughnessy v. BacolasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- E. H. Rohde Leather Co. v. Duncan & Sons, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.