Legal Opinion
State v. Rosemond
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided November 24, 2003No. 25751PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice MOORE:
We granted certiorari to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred by finding petitioner was not entitled to a directed verdict on the charge of strong armed robbery. State v. Rosemond, 348 S.C. 621, 560 S.E.2d 636 (Ct.App.2002). We affirm as modified.
FACTS
Petitioner was charged with strong armed robbery, resisting arrest, and assault and battery with intent to kill. After being found guilty on all counts, he was sentenced to six-years imprisonment, to be served concurrently, on each count.
At trial, Barbara Murray testified she was working the second shift at a convenience…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HiottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- United States v. Raymond WagstaffCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- State v. McHoneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- State v. GourdineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- State v. RosemondCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Kareem DoctorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Pereira-GomezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- State v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.