Legal Opinion

Sanders v. McNutt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1947No. 30813PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The sole question to be determined is whether the amended petition alleges facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The answer to that question depends in part upon the proper construction of certain language found in Section 8621, General Code, as follows:

“No action shall be brought whereby to charge the defendant * * * upon a contract or sale of lands * * * unless the agreement upon which such action is brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, is in ivriting, and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or some other person thereunto by him or her lawfully…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. RHIEL, Trustee.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Randazzo v. KroenkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Schmidt v. WestonOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Elkins v. ColburnOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Hotze, Kuntzler & Co. v. ErskineOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API