Legal Opinion
Patterson v. Goldsmith
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided May 12, 1986No. 0704PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
The respondents Edward A. Goldsmith, Elza Jackson, and Emanuel Jackson seek by a cross-complaint directed against the appellant County of Greenville either to have real property allegedly sold by the County to the plaintiff W. L. Patterson, Jr., reconveyed to them or to be compensated for the “fair value of the land.” The allegations of the cross-complaint rest upon alternate theories of estoppel and “wrongful taking.”
The gist of the cross-complaint is that the County Tax Collector on June 7, 1982, sold property belonging to Goldsmith and the Jacksons for delinquent taxes and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baker v. State Highway Dept.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- Key Sales Co. v. SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANYDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
- Oswald v. County of AikenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- South Carolina National Bank v. Union CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- South Carolina Coastal Council v. VogelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Patterson v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Service Management, Inc. v. State Health & Human Services Finance CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- Carter v. City of CharlestonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1997