Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Kangaloo

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided November 5, 2003No. 021016BPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Agnes, A.J.

INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff, Mark A. Shoemaker (“Shoemaker”) has brought claims against Lamie and Heather Kangaloo (“Lamie” and “Heather”), both in their individual capacities and as trustees to several real estate trusts alleging (1) default under the promissory note and mortgage and security agreements, (2) breach of contract, (3) conversion, (4) fraud, (5) misrepresentation, (6) unjust enrichment, (7) 93A violations, and (8) fraudulent conveyance. Heather has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on all counts and a Motion to Vacate Real Estate Attachments. As the plaintiff has…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API