Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bedford & Hughes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1973No. Appeal, No. 14PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

Appellants, Murrell Bedford and Mary Hughes, were arrested on December 18, 1967, and charged with violating The Drug, Device and Comestic Act (possession of narcotics).1 These charges resulted from a search, conducted pursuant to a warrant, of appellant Bedford’s apartment (with appellant Hughes on the premises) which produced narcotics. After an evidentiary hearing, a timely filed pre-trial motion to suppress evidence was denied. Thereafter on May 28, 1969, in a jury trial, appellants were adjudged guilty of possession of narcotics. Post-trial motions were…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Commonwealth v. MillikenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RueySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. HAGENSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. MillikenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API