Commonwealth v. Milliken
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
On direct appeal from his conviction of murder in the first degree, appellant argued that a warrant authorizing the search of his apartment was unconstitutionally issued because sworn oral testimony was used to supplement the written affidavit. This Court rejected his claim and affirmed the judgment of sentence. Commonwealth v. Milliken, 450 Pa. 310, 300 A.2d 78 (1973). See also United States ex rel. Gaugler v. Brierley, 477 F.2d 516 (3d Cir. 1973); Commonwealth v. Conner, 452 Pa. 333, 305 A.2d 341 (1973); Commonwealth v. Bedford, 451 Pa. 325, 304 A.2d 453…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MillikenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. ConnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States of America Ex Rel. Gilbert John Gaugler v. Joseph Brierley, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Commonwealth v. FrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. MoralesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979