Legal Opinion
Luis Vilchiz-Soto v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 9, 2012No. 12-70253PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Luis Jesus Vilchiz-Soto and Obdulia Resendiz-Ledesma, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of their motion to reopen removal proceedings and reconsider a previous denial of their application for cancellation of removal. The BIA denied the motion to reconsider because petitioners failed to demonstrate any error of fact or law in the BIA’s September 22, 2011 decision, which was based on petitioners’ failure to demonstrate “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” to their qualifying relatives. 8 C.F.R. §…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baltazar Hernandez Barron Margarita Hernandez Ramirez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Maria Martinez-Rosas v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jose Cruz Romero-Torres v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Maricela M. Fernandez, Danelia Fernandez Covarrubias v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Barahona-Gomez v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Omar Cruz Rodriguez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Albertina Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Nshan Ayanian v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- (PS) Ferreira da Silva v. RossDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Abel Sanchez Linares v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.