Legal Opinion

Homar, Inc. v. North Farm Associates

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 18, 1982No. 80-92-AppealPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHEA, Justice.

This is an appeal by North Farm Associates (North Farm) from the entry of summary judgment in the Superior Court in favor of Homar, Inc. (Homar). We affirm the granting of summary judgment.

This controversy has its origins in a construction contract. In November 1977, North Farm, which at the time was known as Bristol Land Co. (Bristol), entered into an agreement with Homar whereby Homar would construct twenty-four condominium dwellings on land owned by North Farm in Bristol, Rhode Island. As the dwellings were completed they were sold to third parties. According to North…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson, Anthony C. Autera v. Manuel Dudley RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. J. Kahn & Co., Inc. v. Clark, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  3. Peloso v. ImperatoreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  4. Castaldi v. Coro Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1958

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Roman Catholic Bishop of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  2. Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  3. McGee v. StoneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  4. Volpe v. Fleet National BankSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  5. In Re McBurney Law Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API