Legal Opinion

Ball, Hutchings & Co. v. Collins

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1886No. Case No. 5938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

The appellee moves to strike out the statement of facts because no written motion for leave to make out and file the statement after the adjournment of the court is found in the record. The order granting the leave was duly made by the judge and is found in the transcript, and the statement itself was filed within the time allowed by the order.

It is supposed that the decision in Blum v. Neilson, 59 Tex., 378, holds that an order of this kind will be of no avail if not granted upon written motion, but such is not the effect of that decision. In that *468case, the order had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Blum v. NeilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Glassgow v. McKinnonTexas Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API