Legal Opinion

(2008)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided February 27, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Sidney A. Katz

On behalf of the Gaithersburg City Council and yourself, you requested our opinion as to the constitutionality of § 15-9 of the Gaithersburg City Code, which was enacted last year to forbid solicitation for certain purposes in and near roadways. You indicated that the State's Attorney's Office has questioned whether the ordinance, which is generally referred to as the "anti-solicitation ordinance," is constitutional.

In compliance with our policies concerning opinion requests from local governments, you provided us with a thorough opinion by the City Attorney. In that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API