Legal Opinion

Schriefer v. Hewlett Manor Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, in so far as it denies motion to strike out the Berger Manufacturing Company as *650a party defendant in the action of Schriefer v. Hewlett Manor Co., Inc., reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The Berger Manufacturing Company has no interest in the real property foreclosed in the light of the bond given to discharge its claim. (Morton v. Tucker, 145 N. Y. 244, 248; Milliken Bros., Incorporated, v. City of N. Y., 201 id. 65, 75; Breen v. Lennon, 10 App. Div. 36, 38.) Order granting motion to consolidate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morton v. . TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Breen v. LennonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sayville Federal, Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Schons, New York County Courts1958
  2. Shepherd Showcase, Inc. v. PekalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Arred Electrical Contracting Corp. v. Herbert Construction Corp. (In re Arred Electrical Contracting Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API