Legal Opinion

Arred Electrical Contracting Corp. v. Herbert Construction Corp. (In re Arred Electrical Contracting Corp.)

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 22, 1989No. Bankruptcy No. 86 B 11393 (BRL); Adv. No. 87-5228APublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURTON R. LIFLAND, Chief Judge.

BACKGROUND

The pertinent facts do not appear to be in dispute. Plaintiff, Arred Electrical Contracting Corp. (“Arred”) was the electrical subcontractor on a residential construction project at 58-60 East 88th Street in Manhattan (the “Project”). On or about April 3, 1987 Arred commenced this adversary proceeding against defendants Herbert Construction Corp. (“Herbert”) and Shnay Construction Corp. (“Shnay”), the general contractor (the “Complaint”) to recover damages in connection with work performed on the Project. Herbert answered the Complaint on or about May…

2Cases cited18 opinions

Ward v. . KilpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
Raymond Concrete Pile Co. v. Federation Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
Tri-City Electric Co. v. PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
Simon v. . VanderveerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
White Plains Sash & Door Co. v. DoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Cavalry Construction, Inc. v. WDF, Inc. (In re Cavalry Construction, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2013