Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Cleveland

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 20, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the District Court of Jefferson. Tried below before Hon. J. D. Martin.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

—The action is by defendant in error to recover $1000, the petition alleging an express contract to pay him all he should sell a certain 100 acres of land for, over $50 an acre; plaintiff having found a purchaser ready, willing and able to pay $60 an acre therefor. The answer was a general denial. There is no statement of facts, but conclusions of fact filed by the judge show that the proof of the terms of the agreement was that defendant should receive not less than $50 per acre for the land, he informing plaintiff that he had been paying 5 per cent commission for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shiner v. AbbeyTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bagley v. BrackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. McGurren v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Vletas v. StagnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. McFaull v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API