Lentz v. Pearson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Dell, Chief Justice.
Appeal from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County denying plaintiff’s motion for amended findings or a new trial.
After discussions extending over a long period plaintiff and defendant, on January 2, 1948, entered into a partnership agreement in writing under the trade name of “Park Studio.” The partnership was formed to carry on a retail rug, carpeting, and home furnishing business at St. Louis Park. Plaintiff was then and still is employed' as a salesman for a wholesale carpeting firm with territory covering several states, including Minnesota. It was agreed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Galson v. GalsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Behrens v. KruseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Bjornstad v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Harding v. Texoleum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Otis Lodge, Inc. v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Michael Bunker v. Kenneth Meshbesher Meshbesher & Spence, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Auge v. Fairchild Equip., Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Auge v. Fairchild Equipment, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019