Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Buckstaff
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Chapman, J. The facts are stated in the opinion. contending the building was vacant or unoccupied within the meaning of the policy and that the company is not liable, cited: Farmers Ins. Go. v. Wells, 42 O. St., 519; American Ins. Co. v. Padjield, 78 111., 167; Ashworth v. Builders Mutual Fire Co., 112 Mass., 422; Corrigan v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co., 122 Mass., 298; JEtna Ins.
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Chapman, J. The facts are stated in the opinion. contending the building was vacant or unoccupied within the meaning of the policy and that the company is not liable, cited: Farmers Ins. Go. v. Wells, 42 O. St., 519; American Ins. Co. v. Padjield, 78 111., 167; Ashworth v. Builders Mutual Fire Co., 112 Mass., 422; Corrigan v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co., 122 Mass., 298; JEtna Ins. Co. v. Meyers, 63 Ind., 238; Cook v. Continental Ins. Co., 70 Mo., 610; Dennison v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 52 la., 457; McClure v. Watertown Fire Ins.…
1Opinion of the CourtNokval, J.
This is an action upon a fire insurance policy issued by the plaintiff in error upon the same building covered by the policy sued on in the case of German-American Insurance Co. v. Buckstaff, 38 Neb., 135, decided herewith. The stipulations in the policies are substantially alike, and the issues presented by the pleadings in the two cases are the same. By agreement of parties this cause was submitted to the trial court on the evidence taken in that suit. There was judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $1,694.82.
What is said in the opinion in the case above referred to bearing upon the charge…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lockwood v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- Springfield F. & M. Ins. v. McLimans & CoyleNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Enyeart v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
- Doud v. Citizens' Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Hotchkiss v. Phœnix Insurance Co. of BrooklynWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- German Insurance v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Insurance Co. of North America v. CoombsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Alling v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Bell v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- East Texas Fire Insurance v. KempnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.