Legal Opinion

People v. Corcillo

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBookstein, J.

The first-named defendants are professional bail bondsmen. (Insurance Law, § 331; Code Grim. Pro., § 554-b.) The second above-named defendants are sureties on the qualifying bonds furnished by the above first-named defendants, pursuant to the foregoing sections of the Insurance Law and the Code of Criminal Procedure. The three bonds of the defendant National Surety Corporation are for the license year 1944 and the three bonds of the defendant Century Indemnity Company are for the license year 1945.

These six actions are brought against the three first above-named defendants as principals and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Accounting of GoldsteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. New York Stock ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  2. JACK MORGAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. LarkanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Lank v. New York Stock ExchangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  4. People v. Weeks, New York County Courts1963
  5. JACK MORGAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. LarkanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API