Linscott v. Shasteen

Nebraska Advance Sheets 276 288 NEBRASKA REPORTS dictate that appointment of a GAL was “mandatory” and that the county court’s failure to make the appointment was plain error.23 Unless the court is prepared to overrule this precedent, it should be followed. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s failure to do so. Miller-Lerman, J., joins in this dissent. 23 See id. Martin V. Linscott, individually and on behalf of Shasteen, Linscott & Brock, P.C., a Nebraska professional corporation, appellant, v. Rolf Edward Shasteen and Tony J. Brock, appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed June 6, 2014. No.…