Legal Opinion

Williams v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 1953No. 1280PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellant was charged with violation of Title 33, Section 416 of the District of Columbia Code, which reads:

“Any store, shop, warehouse, dwelling-house, building, vehicle, boat, aircraft, or any place whatever, which is resorted to by narcotic drug addicts for the purpose of using narcotic drugs or which is used for the illegal keeping or selling of the same, shall be deemed a common nuisance. No person shall keep or maintain such a common nuisance.”

Trial was before a jury, which found appellant guilty, and he was sentenced.

At the trial it was shown by the Government…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cromer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  2. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Chin Gum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
  4. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925
  5. Pennacchio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  2. Williams v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API