Legal Opinion

United States v. Morales

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 1, 1975No. 29,297PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Cook, Judge:

Reviewing accused’s conviction of two drug offenses, the Army Court of Military Review determined that prosecution exhibits indicating previous misconduct by the accused "did not qualify as official records” and were, therefore, legally inadmissible. United States v Morales, 49 CMR 458, 461 (ACMR 1974). Although the entire court agreed that the inadmissible evidence resulted in a "more severe” sentence than the court-martial would have imposed had the improper evidence not been before it, a majority refused relief to the accused because at trial defense counsel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. RivasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. HardenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. MackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. DukesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  5. United States v. NegroneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API