Commonwealth v. Clark C.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
Beck,
J. A Juvenile Court judge suppressed “all statements” a juvenile made to Larry Brown, a Springfield police lieutenant. In its interlocutory appeal, see Mass.R.Crim.P. 15(a)(2), as appearing in 422 Mass. 1501 (1996), the Commonwealth claims that none of the three “categories” of statements at issue here constituted custodial interrogation and therefore should not have been suppressed. We reverse the judge’s findings as to the first two statements and affirm as to the third.
Governing legal principles. “Miranda safeguards come into play whenever a person in custody is subjected to either…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Commonwealth v. MelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- United States v. Jean M. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. QuinonesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2019
- In re D.L.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Commonwealth v. RamirezMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. Jason EstabrookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2025
- In Re DLDCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010